Skip to main content

Critical Consumption and consumerism

 Based on curriculum specifications - Core value: Responsibility (Global Sustainability)


Objectives:

1) Students will be able to categorize environmentally friendly and non-environmentally products.

2) Students will be able to evaluate the impact of their consumption choices on transportation, production, and the environment, society, and their own well-being.

3) Students will be able to identify products that align with their values and boycott products that go against their beliefs.


Materials: Whiteboard and markers, video, computer, big paper

Procedure:

Show video

Warm-up (10 mins): 

1. Ask students what is the item shown on the video and what are the environmental impacts as a result of the product?

2. Ask students to brainstorm the different types of products they consume on a daily basis. Write these on the whiteboard. Then ask students to categorize these products as either environmentally friendly or not.



Evaluation of consumption choices (20 mins): 

1. Teacher divides students into groups of 4-5.

2. Provide big white paper to the students.

3. Ask students to choose one product they consume regularly and research the impact of its production, transportation, and disposal on the environment and society. Once they have completed their research, ask them to fill out the big white paper, evaluating the impact of their consumption choice on the environment, society, and their own well-being.

4. Every group pastes their work (the big paper) around the classroom.

Evidence from my class:





5. Instruct the students to do a gallery walk and have individual students think about which product they would like to boycott due to its impact on the environment, society, and well-being. Every group will stay at one spot for one minute and then they rotate. 





Speaking activity :

Students explain the reason they want to boycott the item and explain the manner in which they do this.

Conclusion (10 mins): Summarize the key points of the lesson and ask students to reflect on their own consumption habits. Encourage them to consider how they can make more mindful and politically informed choices in their future consumption habits.


Reflection: Being critical of our product consumption requires thinking about factors that are not immediate and indirect but can have an impact on the environment nonetheless. For these groups of students, aid them to see the hidden factors that can have an environmental impact due to our consumption of certain products such as transportation. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Project-based learning: Envisioning a sustainable city/town (SDG 11)

The driving question: How do you envision your town/city to be more sustainable?  *Before starting the project, identify an organization or a group of individuals who can provide feedback on your students' PBL product. Write a formal letter endorsed by your principal inviting them to partner with your school.  Objectives: 1. Enhance students' vocabulary (less common lexis) on the theme of 'environment' 2. Produce community solutions in the context of sustainable city/town planning English language proficiency level:  Intermediate to Advanced Stage 1: Introduction to sustainable city/town planning  (Period of implementation: 1 - 1 and a half hour) 1. Show a video on 'sustainable city planning' to students on Youtube (Listening activity)       a) Show them this video -  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViJIJh-BNq8   b) Distribute this handout to them. They watch and listen while filling out the handout. Play the video twice. Check for answers.  c)  Show this video

Social media, misinformation, and government regulation

*Based on Manual Kesedaran Sivik Sekolah Menengah - Tajuk: Persahabatan Merentasi Sempadan This is a lesson plan aligned with Form 4 Chapter 1 : Let's Chat. By the end of the lesson, students should be able to: 1. Define the term 'misinformation', 'disinformation' and 'malinformation'. 2. Write down their thoughts about the article. 2. Discuss about the pros and cons of government regulation on social media. Activities: 1.    Show a video on ‘Misinformation, Disinformation, and Malinformation'. 2.  Ask students to choose the correct definition of the terms - ( download powerpoint slides ) 3.  Teacher distributes the newspaper article:   Teo Nie Ching: Communications Ministry to  focus on addressing misinformation on social media  (advanced classes), (low intermediate version) 4.  Students read the article for 5-10 minutes. 5.  Ask students ‘what’s going on?’ & ‘what do you see, hear or read?’ and write their answers on post-it notes and paste them o

Roundtable discussion: Freedom of Speech

Proficiency level: B1 - B2 (Independent user: Intermediate-Upper intermediate)   Skills: Writing Integrated skill: Speaking Teaching materials: Dictionary, mahjong paper, marker pen, Article 10 of the Malaysian Constitution (simplified)   Objective: a)   Brainstorm in groups b) Express feelings, opinions, and dissatisfaction through the proper channels   Set induction: Teacher writes ‘freedom of speech’ on the board and asks students what they know about this concept. Teacher writes students’ responses on the board.   *A note on this part: I had to translate 'freedom of speech' to Malay then only I could elicit a response from them.   Activities:   1. Give handouts of the Malaysian Constitution (Article 10) to students and tell the students to read through it for 5-10 minutes. *A note on this step: For this level of proficiency, provide the Constitution both in English and Malay. Teach students that the Malaysian Constitution forbids any open criticism toward the '3R' -